CGJ (was RE: Proposal to add QAMATS QATAN to the BMP of the UCS

From: Peter Constable (
Date: Wed May 05 2004 - 16:19:25 CDT

> From: Philippe Verdy []

> I note that the definition of combining sequences in TUS 4.0.1 was
updated to
> include ZWJ and ZWNJ, but still not CGJ, in the middle or at end of a
> sequence. This is shown in the list of changes. Has there been an
agreement made
> to accept CGJ too? Or is this question in the decision pipe for a
later vote
> during some next UTC meeting?


Philippe, there is no need to change anything. CGJ does not have to be
explicitly described as being allowed in combining sequences because, by
virtue of its general category (Mn), it is implicitly already allowed in
combining sequences.

The term "COMBINING" in the name is more than a bit of a clue...

Peter Constable
Globalization Infrastructure and Font Technologies
Microsoft Windows Division

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri May 07 2004 - 18:45:26 CDT