RE: Phoenician

From: Kent Karlsson (kentk@cs.chalmers.se)
Date: Thu May 13 2004 - 04:25:45 CDT

  • Next message: Michael Everson: "RE: interleaved ordering (was RE: Phoenician)"

    Michael Everson Wrote:
    > This sort
    > of battle was fought over Runic: Runologists wanted the Runes to be
    > sorted in Latin alphabetical order,

    Yes, but there was no suggestion to interleave the Runes with
    the Latin script. So the example of the Runes is not a parallel
    to the current discussion.

                    /kent k

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu May 13 2004 - 04:32:35 CDT