RE: Phoenician

From: Michael Everson (everson@evertype.com)
Date: Thu May 13 2004 - 04:51:42 CDT

  • Next message: Kent Karlsson: "RE: interleaved ordering (was RE: Phoenician)"

    At 11:25 +0200 2004-05-13, Kent Karlsson wrote:
    >Michael Everson Wrote:
    >> This sort
    >> of battle was fought over Runic: Runologists wanted the Runes to be
    >> sorted in Latin alphabetical order,
    >
    >Yes, but there was no suggestion to interleave the Runes with the
    >Latin script. So the example of the Runes is not a parallel to the
    >current discussion.

    That's true.

    -- 
    Michael Everson * * Everson Typography *  * http://www.evertype.com
    


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu May 13 2004 - 04:52:26 CDT