From: Michael Everson (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Fri May 14 2004 - 13:37:41 CDT
At 14:25 -0400 2004-05-14, email@example.com wrote:
>Michael Everson scripsit:
>> You can't play around with Ogham directionality like that. Reversing
>> it makes it read completely differently! The first example reads
>> INGACLU; the second reads ULCAGNI.
>Which is as much to say that R2L Ogham is illegible. But is T2B Ogham
>necessarily illegible, especially if the glyphs were to be reversed?
Try it and see. ;-)
-- Michael Everson * * Everson Typography * * http://www.evertype.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri May 14 2004 - 13:42:59 CDT