Date: Fri May 14 2004 - 15:29:41 CDT
Michael Everson scripsit:
> >Which is as much to say that R2L Ogham is illegible. But is T2B Ogham
> >necessarily illegible, especially if the glyphs were to be reversed?
> Try it and see. ;-)
It's all Greek to me.
-- "How they ever reached any conclusion at all email@example.com> is starkly unknowable to the human mind." http://www.reutershealth.com --"Backstage Lensman", Randall Garrett http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri May 14 2004 - 15:30:24 CDT