Re: [BULK] - Re: Interleaved collation of related scripts

From: Patrick Andries (Patrick.Andries@xcential.com)
Date: Fri May 14 2004 - 16:17:06 CDT

  • Next message: Patrick Andries: "Re: interleaved ordering (was RE: Phoenician)"

    jcowan@reutershealth.com a écrit :

    >Peter Kirk scripsit:
    >
    >
    >
    >>Well, I accepted somewhat reluctantly that Phoenician should be
    >>separately encoded because a small number of users want it to be,
    >>although a majority apparently do not want it to be.
    >>
    >>
    >
    >Neither you nor anyone else knows what the majority wants, because most
    >interested parties have never even heard of this debate. It's natural
    >to suppose that The Majority R Us, but there's no evidence for it.
    >
    >In any case, it's the majority in the UTC (and ultimately the Consortium)
    >that matters, and the UTC works mostly by consensus anyway.
    >
    >
    There is such a thing as ISO JTC1/SC2/WG2.

    P. A.



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri May 14 2004 - 16:17:51 CDT