Re: interleaved ordering (was RE: Phoenician)

From: Patrick Andries (Patrick.Andries@xcential.com)
Date: Fri May 14 2004 - 16:18:47 CDT

  • Next message: Mike Ayers: "RE: [BULK] - Re: Interleaved collation of related scripts"

    jameskass@att.net a écrit :

    >Dean A. Snyder wrote,
    >
    >
    >
    >>The issue is not what we CAN do; the issue is what will we be FORCED to
    >>do that already happens right now by default in operating systems,
    >>Google, databases, etc. without any end user fiddling?
    >>
    >>
    >
    >That's the question.
    >
    >Since search engines like Google survive based on their ability to serve
    >users' wants and find what users seek, why wouldn't Google make such
    >a tailoring?
    >
    >
    Because the Phoenician user community is very very small ? Same goes for
    Microsoft on some collations already mentioned (French Canadian sorting,
    Khmer) and those are much larger communities.

    P. A.

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri May 14 2004 - 16:19:29 CDT