Re: [BULK] - Re: Interleaved collation of related scripts

From: Doug Ewell (
Date: Fri May 14 2004 - 16:37:22 CDT

  • Next message: "RE: interleaved ordering (was RE: Phoenician)"

    RE: [BULK] - Re: Interleaved collation of related scriptsOne favor --
    when talking about search engines that convert Palaeo-Hebrew or
    Phoenician or whatever into modern Hebrew, can we please avoid the word

    That has a very specific meaning in Unicode, and I'd hate for somebody
    to leave this thread thinking that characters from different encoded
    scripts would be made canonical equivalents of one another.

    -Doug Ewell
     Fullerton, California

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri May 14 2004 - 16:37:14 CDT