From: Michael Everson (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Wed May 19 2004 - 18:19:01 CDT
At 01:08 +0200 2004-05-20, Philippe Verdy wrote:
>I see some differences
>- For Georgian, your new file contains only:
> Georgian (Mkhedruli);Geor;240;géorgien (mkhédrouli);Georgian;2004-05-18
>But the previous version also contained in one of the online tables:
> Georgian (Asomtavruli);Geoa;242;géorgien
That's correct. Asomtavruli has been deleted for now.
>- Where is this line?:
> Syloti Nagri;Sylo;316;sylotî nâgrî;;2004-09-01
A new script? Oh, it's in the old file and not in
the new one? It, Coptic, and Phags-pa need to be
in the list (they are all under ballot).
>Limbu has been adjusted to a more appropriate numeric code within South-Asian
>scripts (401 to 336).
>I also think that the removal of duplicate rows for English or French name
>aliases was a good decision (after all the aliases are already listed between
No, it would allow a huge number of aliases.
People can search the online files with command-F
>I also think that slpitting the line for the start end end codes
>of private scripts was a good idea.
It wasn't mine. I forget whose it was, but it
makes the tables print more nicely.
-- Michael Everson * * Everson Typography * * http://www.evertype.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed May 19 2004 - 18:20:08 CDT