Re: Response to Everson Phoenician and why June 7?

From: jameskass@att.net
Date: Thu May 20 2004 - 14:17:41 CDT

Next message: Michael Everson: "RE: ISO 15924 draft fixes"

Previous message: jameskass@att.net: "Re: Response to Everson Phoenician and why June 7?"
Maybe in reply to: Rick McGowan: "Response to Everson Phoenician and why June 7?"
Next in thread: E. Keown: "Re: Response to Everson Phoenician and why June 7?"
Reply: E. Keown: "Re: Response to Everson Phoenician and why June 7?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Peter Kirk wrote,

> The solution may be a catch-all, but the problem is a real one. Dr
> Kaufman's response makes it clear that to professionals in the field
> Everson's proposal is not just questionable but ridiculous. There is
> certainly some PR work to be done in this area, not name-calling.

Does Dr. Kaufman speak for all professionals in the field, or would
it be fair to say that Dr. Kaufman is speaking for only one such
professional?

Best regards,

James Kass

Next message: Michael Everson: "RE: ISO 15924 draft fixes"
Previous message: jameskass@att.net: "Re: Response to Everson Phoenician and why June 7?"
Maybe in reply to: Rick McGowan: "Response to Everson Phoenician and why June 7?"
Next in thread: E. Keown: "Re: Response to Everson Phoenician and why June 7?"
Reply: E. Keown: "Re: Response to Everson Phoenician and why June 7?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu May 20 2004 - 14:18:20 CDT