Re: ISO 15924 codes for ConScript

From: Doug Ewell (
Date: Thu May 20 2004 - 23:02:37 CDT

  • Next message: James Kass: "Re: Response to Everson Phoenician and why June 7?"

    Curtis Clark <jcclark at mockfont dot com> wrote:

    >>> One person wrote, regarding Qaak for Klingon:
    >>>> It's a shame you didn't pick something that could be pronounced in
    >>>> tlhIngan Hol, perhaps Qaap for pIqaD.
    >> Identifiers are identifiers, not words.
    > That's why I sent my message to Doug off-list; it was a joke.

    Note that I identified you only as "one person," so as not to breach
    netiquette by re-posting to the list.

    I took it semi-seriously. One never knows what issues are going to be
    critically important to Klingon aficionados. All I know is that the
    code I did choose for Klingon is something that can be pronounced by the
    AFLAC Duck.

    -Doug Ewell
     Fullerton, California

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu May 20 2004 - 23:03:34 CDT