Re: ISO 15924

From: Michael \(michka\) Kaplan (michka@trigeminal.com)
Date: Thu May 20 2004 - 22:41:29 CDT

Next message: Doug Ewell: "Re: ISO 15924 codes for ConScript"

Previous message: James Kass: "Re: Response to Everson Phoenician and why June 7?"
In reply to: Mahesh T. Pai: "Re: ISO 15924"
Next in thread: Philippe Verdy: "Re: ISO 15924"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

<<<Fix the typo and the kingdom shall be your bounty>>>

MichKa

P.S. Hint: the subject is smarter than the body.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Mahesh T. Pai" <paivakil@vsnl.net>
To: <unicode@unicode.org>
Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2004 7:49 PM
Subject: Re: ISO 15924

> Michael Everson said on Fri, May 21, 2004 at 12:56:44AM +0100,:
>
> > http://www.unicode.org/iso15294. The Registrar thanks everyone who
>
> I am getting a 404 here?
>
>
> --
>
> "Those willing to give up a little liberty for a little security
> deserve neither security nor liberty"
>
>

Next message: Doug Ewell: "Re: ISO 15924 codes for ConScript"
Previous message: James Kass: "Re: Response to Everson Phoenician and why June 7?"
In reply to: Mahesh T. Pai: "Re: ISO 15924"
Next in thread: Philippe Verdy: "Re: ISO 15924"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu May 20 2004 - 22:42:36 CDT