Re: [META] Should there be a separate public list for CLDR?

From: Michael Everson (
Date: Sat May 22 2004 - 14:43:58 CDT

  • Next message: Michael Everson: "Re: Phoenician numbers"

    At 12:30 -0700 2004-05-22, Peter Kirk wrote:

    >Well, CLDR and ISO 15924 are both about locales, and not about
    >character encoding.

    ISO 15924 is about script codes. It is not "about locales".

    >If this discussion does indeed come to an end soon, I will be happy.
    >But I will continue to be unhappy if James' point is ignored and
    >this list continues to be the forum for discussion of typographical
    >niceties of a standard that I have no interest in.

    Phoenician has its own code. :-)

    >And in case anyone is thinking of complaining about how much
    >discussion of Phoenician there has been on this list, I did try to
    >divert the discussion to the Hebrew list right at the start, but
    >everyone else wanted to discuss it here.

    Because it doesn't belong there.

    Michael Everson * * Everson Typography *  *

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat May 22 2004 - 14:45:47 CDT