Re: Response to Everson Phoenician and why June 7?

From: Michael Everson (everson@evertype.com)
Date: Mon May 24 2004 - 08:21:06 CDT

Next message: Mark E. Shoulson: "Re: Response to Everson Phoenician and why June 7?"

Previous message: Peter Constable: "PH as font variant of Hebrew (was RE: Response to Everson Phoenician and why June 7?"
In reply to: Peter Kirk: "Re: Response to Everson Phoenician and why June 7?"
Next in thread: Curtis Clark: "Re: Response to Everson Phoenician and why June 7?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Peter Kirk.

On 2004-05-12 you recanted and said that you agreed with my
conclusion. I assumed that meant you supported the encoding of
Phoenician.

Perhaps I was wrong. Or perhaps you changed your mind. Grand. Perhaps
you will change it again. Or not.

-- 
Michael Everson * * Everson Typography *  * http://www.evertype.com

Next message: Mark E. Shoulson: "Re: Response to Everson Phoenician and why June 7?"
Previous message: Peter Constable: "PH as font variant of Hebrew (was RE: Response to Everson Phoenician and why June 7?"
In reply to: Peter Kirk: "Re: Response to Everson Phoenician and why June 7?"
Next in thread: Curtis Clark: "Re: Response to Everson Phoenician and why June 7?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon May 24 2004 - 08:21:48 CDT