Re: Response to Everson Phoenician and why June 7?

From: Michael Everson (everson@evertype.com)
Date: Mon May 24 2004 - 15:51:57 CDT

Next message: Michael Everson: "Re: Response to Everson Phoenician and why June 7?"

Previous message: Kenneth Whistler: "Language Tagging in Plain Text (was: Re: Response to blah blah blah)"
In reply to: Dean Snyder: "Re: Response to Everson Phoenician and why June 7?"
Next in thread: Peter Kirk: "Re: Response to Everson Phoenician and why June 7?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

At 15:56 -0400 2004-05-24, Dean Snyder wrote:
>Michael Everson wrote at 6:19 PM on Monday, May 24, 2004:
>
>>That's why Palaeo-Hebrew and Hebrew are unified.
>
>That's an interesting change of opinion.

It was a typo.

>What motivates your current unification of Palaeo-Hebrew and Hebrew?

It was a typo.

>On what basis are you now separating Palaeo-Hebrew from Phoenician?

It was a typo.

-- 
Michael Everson * * Everson Typography *  * http://www.evertype.com

Next message: Michael Everson: "Re: Response to Everson Phoenician and why June 7?"
Previous message: Kenneth Whistler: "Language Tagging in Plain Text (was: Re: Response to blah blah blah)"
In reply to: Dean Snyder: "Re: Response to Everson Phoenician and why June 7?"
Next in thread: Peter Kirk: "Re: Response to Everson Phoenician and why June 7?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon May 24 2004 - 15:53:41 CDT