From: Mark Davis (email@example.com)
Date: Tue May 25 2004 - 15:18:37 CDT
Who, exactly, was supposed to have done the ignoring? And when? This sounds like
a piece of gossip -- I still hear no facts.
For all we know, Alan spoke to his cousin Lenny, whose friend Bubba had a sister
Emma who worked at the factory for Unicoat (Airplane Coating Systems) in
Atlanta, and said her boss wasn't interested in Hebrew.
► शिष्यादिच्छेत्पराजयम् ◄
----- Original Message -----
From: "E. Keown" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
To: "Mark Davis" <email@example.com>; <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Sent: Tue, 2004 May 25 10:51
Subject: Re: Response to Everson Ph and why Jun 7? fervor
> Elaine Keown
> Dear Mark Davis:
> The events in question happened in the Very Archaic
> Unicode Era (1987-88), before 'document repositories'
> etc, were invented.
> At that point, I understand you were still
> communicating in paper or clay, as needed.....
> Right now one of the board members of ANSI (William
> Kelly) and also Debbie Anderson are trying to make
> sure there is communication between Unicode/ISO and
> the scholarly world...
> But in the Very Archaic Unicode Era, apparently no one
> was doing this.
> I just wrote 2 preliminary proposals (Babylonian
> Pointing, Samaritan pointing), and McGowan/Ksar gave
> me document numbers. I hope to write 2 more proposals
> in the next two weeks. The font will not be done
> until July.
> These four proposals are basic groundwork for later
> proposals (Hebrew collation, a subject already
> relished by the list), since they should complete
> 90-something-% of "Extended Hebrew."
> Elaine Keown
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue May 25 2004 - 15:19:36 CDT