Re: Proposal to encode dominoes and other game symbols

From: Michael \(michka\) Kaplan (michka@trigeminal.com)
Date: Wed May 26 2004 - 09:29:49 CDT

  • Next message: Peter Kirk: "Re: Phoenician, Fraktur etc"

    From: "Michael Everson" <everson@evertype.com>
    To: <unicode@unicode.org>
    Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2004 5:35 AM
    Subject: Re: Proposal to encode dominoes and other game symbols

    > At 13:09 +0100 2004-05-26, Michael Everson wrote:
    >
    > >Just because someone hasn't put them on a web page (in a clumsy
    > >graphic) yet doesn't mean that it isn't reasonable to wait for them
    > >to do so.
    >
    > RECTE Just because someone hasn't put them on a web page (in a clumsy
    > graphic) yet doesn't mean that it isn't *un*reasonable to wait for
    > them to do so.

    The first version was better, in my opinion. Perhaps we would leave room for
    the future, but Unicode and WG2 both have enough work to do without assuming
    needs not yet proven and not yet requested.

    MichKa [MS]
    NLS Collation/Locale/Keyboard Development
    Globalization Infrastructure and Font Technologies

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed May 26 2004 - 09:33:04 CDT