From: Jon Hanna (email@example.com)
Date: Wed Jun 02 2004 - 10:23:16 CDT
> Annex H of "Principles and Procedures" specifically mentions the STOP
> SIGN as an example of a symbol that should *not* be encoded, and that
> was exactly my point.
I am now convinced that, whether it is a good idea or not, STOP SIGN will be
encoded at some point in the next 5 years, as Fortune's demonstration that the
Gods laugh at all plans.
-- Jon Hanna <http://www.hackcraft.net/> "…it has been truly said that hackers have even more words for equipment failures than Yiddish has for obnoxious people." - jargon.txt
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jun 02 2004 - 10:24:01 CDT