Re: Holam (was Errors in TUS Figure 15.2?)

From: Peter Kirk (
Date: Tue Aug 03 2004 - 05:06:58 CDT

  • Next message: Theo Veenker: "UAX 15 hangul composition"

    On 03/08/2004 07:40, Jony Rosenne wrote:

    >The same applies to recent arguments raised concerning the Holam and Vav and
    >the philosophical nature of the ways they combine.
    Agreed. If the proposed encoding with ZWNJ does what is needed (or
    should do when implementations are updated to support TUS 4.0.1), let's
    stop philosophical objections and accept it. If it really does not, we
    need to look elsewhere.

    Peter Kirk (personal) (work)

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Aug 03 2004 - 05:10:02 CDT