Re: XML and Unicode interoperability comes before HTML or even SGML (was: Combining across markup?)

From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk (qrczak@knm.org.pl)
Date: Sat Aug 14 2004 - 08:07:47 CDT

Next message: Peter Constable: "RE: [mo/mol] and [ro/ron/rum]"

Previous message: Anto'nio Martins-Tuva'lkin: "Re: [mo/mol] and [ro/ron/rum]"
In reply to: Philippe Verdy: "Re: XML and Unicode interoperability comes before HTML or even SGML (was: Combining across markup?)"
Next in thread: Doug Ewell: "Re: XML and Unicode interoperability comes before HTML or even SGML"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

W liście z sob, 14-08-2004, godz. 12:35 +0200, Philippe Verdy napisał:

> Simply because, for both Unicode and ISO/IEC 10646, the character
> model includes the fact that ANY base character forms a combining
> character sequence with ANY following combining character or ZW(N)J
> character.

Shouldn't grapheme cluser boundary and word boundary rules in
<http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr29/> handle ZW(N)J?

-- 
   __("<         Marcin Kowalczyk
   \__/       qrczak@knm.org.pl
    ^^     http://qrnik.knm.org.pl/~qrczak/

Next message: Peter Constable: "RE: [mo/mol] and [ro/ron/rum]"
Previous message: Anto'nio Martins-Tuva'lkin: "Re: [mo/mol] and [ro/ron/rum]"
In reply to: Philippe Verdy: "Re: XML and Unicode interoperability comes before HTML or even SGML (was: Combining across markup?)"
Next in thread: Doug Ewell: "Re: XML and Unicode interoperability comes before HTML or even SGML"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Aug 14 2004 - 08:10:08 CDT