From: Doug Ewell (email@example.com)
Date: Sat Aug 21 2004 - 10:40:31 CDT
Sinnathurai Srivas <sisrivas at blueyonder dot co dot uk> wrote:
> Could you include the followin.
> Why even after about 20 years of existence, the unicode is not
> supported by any significant software and applications?
> What if ISO-8859-X for any one who wanted it be allowed to exist (as a
> standard) in parallel, while Unicode learns and matures it's too
> advanced, but difficult technology.
> In the name of promoting Unicode, are we holdingback multilingual
> computing for the next 10 years or so?
And you guys thought I couldn't spot a troll. Ha.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Aug 21 2004 - 10:43:30 CDT