From: D. Starner (email@example.com)
Date: Sat Sep 18 2004 - 19:40:02 CDT
Christopher Fynn wrote:
> Is there any plan to include sets of shorthand (Pitman, Gregg etc.)
> symbols in Unicode? Or are they something which is specifically excluded?
They're a form of handwriting, which is generally excluded. Why do
they need to be encoded in a computer? General practice, at least,
is to transcribe them into standard writing first.
-- ___________________________________________________________ Sign-up for Ads Free at Mail.com http://promo.mail.com/adsfreejump.htm
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Sep 18 2004 - 19:40:59 CDT