From: Michael Everson (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Tue Sep 28 2004 - 10:46:08 CST
At 09:09 -0700 2004-09-28, Eric Muller wrote:
>Isn't it problematic to have the distinction between (MIDDLE) HOOK
>and DESCENDER for GHE (494/4F6), KA (4C3/49A) and arguably EN
>(4C7/4C9) but not for PE?
If PE-DESCENDER is really used in Abkhaz. I wouldn't take the chart
in D&B for gospel. I haven't checked my Abkhaz files yet.
>That being said, I am not trying to beat the master of
>disunification 8-) If we agree that 4A6/7 is it, then we need at
>least an annotation "can be rendered with a descender instead of a
>hook", or may be go all the way for a change of the representative
>glyph to use a descender, since that is the form used in both D&B
>and in the Abkhaz font.
We need more evidence to encode a PE-DESCENDER or to annotate a book
that just those two sources, I should think.
-- Michael Everson * * Everson Typography * * http://www.evertype.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Sep 28 2004 - 10:50:04 CST