Public Review Issues Update (correction)

From: Rick McGowan (
Date: Tue Oct 12 2004 - 15:24:50 CST

  • Next message: Werner LEMBERG: "Re: bit notation in ISO-8859-x is wrong"

    There has been a further update to the document for Public Review Issue
    #48 (Directional Run) to clarify and expand the proposed definition. If you
    have already reviewed the document, I apologize for the inconvenience. The
    revised document is linked from the review page:


    And may be accessed directly from the following URL:


    The closing date for comments on this issue remains 2004/11/08.

    If you have comments for official UTC consideration, please post them by
    submitting your comments through our feedback & reporting page:

    If you wish to discuss issues on the Unicode mail list, then please
    use the following link to subscribe (if necessary). Please be aware
    that discussion comments on the Unicode mail list are not automatically
    recorded as input to the UTC. You must use the reporting link above
    to generate comments for UTC consideration.

            Rick McGowan
            Unicode, Inc.

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Oct 12 2004 - 15:26:20 CST