From: Mike Ayers (mike.ayers@tumbleweed.com)
Date: Wed Oct 13 2004 - 12:04:17 CST
> From: unicode-bounce@unicode.org
> [mailto:unicode-bounce@unicode.org] On Behalf Of Eric Muller
> Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2004 10:00 AM
> But what if U+1ebd is not part of the repertoire supported by
> that other process?
Then that other process is not Unicode conformant. If you must deal
with such nonconformant (or "fragile") processes, you may find that you need
to store your Unicode data as binary. But that should only be done if there
is absolutely no way to replace the fragile piece with a conformant one, as
there are many potential problems and obstacles in doing so.
/|/|ike
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Oct 13 2004 - 12:07:57 CST