RE: outside decomposed, inside precomposed

From: Mike Ayers (mike.ayers@tumbleweed.com)
Date: Wed Oct 13 2004 - 12:04:17 CST

  • Next message: Kenneth Whistler: "Re: outside decomposed, inside precomposed"

    > From: unicode-bounce@unicode.org
    > [mailto:unicode-bounce@unicode.org] On Behalf Of Eric Muller
    > Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2004 10:00 AM
     
    > But what if U+1ebd is not part of the repertoire supported by
    > that other process?

            Then that other process is not Unicode conformant. If you must deal
    with such nonconformant (or "fragile") processes, you may find that you need
    to store your Unicode data as binary. But that should only be done if there
    is absolutely no way to replace the fragile piece with a conformant one, as
    there are many potential problems and obstacles in doing so.

    /|/|ike



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Oct 13 2004 - 12:07:57 CST