Re: Windows Latin1?

From: Doug Ewell (dewell@adelphia.net)
Date: Sat Nov 06 2004 - 22:17:44 CST

Next message: Doug Ewell: "Re: not font designers?"

Previous message: Theodore H. Smith: "Windows Latin1?"
In reply to: Theodore H. Smith: "Windows Latin1?"
Next in thread: Playing hide and seek on the graveyards: "Re: Windows Latin1?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Theodore H. Smith <delete at elfdata dot com> wrote:

> Are the Unicode Code Points from +U0 to +UFF, equivalent to the
> Windows Latin 1 code points?
>
> Or is it equivalent to ISO-Latin-1?

The Unicode code points from U+0000 to U+00FF (note correct notation)
are equivalent to ISO 8859-1 ("Latin-1").

This is equivalent to Windows code page 1252, except for the range from
0x80 to 0x9F, which in CP1252 is mostly (but not completely) filled with
additional graphic characters. In Unicode and ISO 8859-1, this range
contains control characters.

-Doug Ewell
Fullerton, California
http://users.adelphia.net/~dewell/

Next message: Doug Ewell: "Re: not font designers?"
Previous message: Theodore H. Smith: "Windows Latin1?"
In reply to: Theodore H. Smith: "Windows Latin1?"
Next in thread: Playing hide and seek on the graveyards: "Re: Windows Latin1?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 06 2004 - 22:23:29 CST