From: Peter Constable (petercon@microsoft.com)
Date: Tue Nov 23 2004 - 00:26:19 CST
> From: unicode-bounce@unicode.org [mailto:unicode-bounce@unicode.org]
On
> Behalf Of Edward H. Trager
> > > A better CSS class would additionally specify the font-family,
> > > for example, something like the SIL Ezra font
> > >
>
(http://scripts.sil.org/cms/scripts/page.php?site_id=nrsi&id=EzraSIL_Hom
e)
...
> Are you saying the difference in names is "SIL Ezra" vs. "Ezra SIL" ?
> That's too confusing!
>
> When I gave the URL, I checked that it was referring
> to an "OpenType" font --and since it was OpenType, I assumed that it
was
> the
> newer version with a Unicode CMAP. If SIL still has links to legacy
non-
> Unicode
> versions of fonts which now also have Unicode versions, then they
should
> make
> this really clear to people. My apologies if I provided the wrong
URL.
Your URL was to the Unicode-encoded OpenType font. The pages for that
font (Ezra SIL) and the legacy-encoded font (SIL Ezra) very clearly
indicate which is which.
Peter Constable
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Nov 23 2004 - 00:30:15 CST