Re: No Invisible Character - NBSP at the start of a word

From: John Hudson (tiro@tiro.com)
Date: Sat Nov 27 2004 - 18:58:46 CST

Next message: Addison Phillips [wM]: "RE: Ligatures"

Previous message: John Hudson: "Re: No Invisible Character - NBSP at the start of a word"
In reply to: Mark E. Shoulson: "Re: No Invisible Character - NBSP at the start of a word"
Next in thread: Asmus Freytag: "Re: No Invisible Character - NBSP at the start of a word"
Reply: Asmus Freytag: "Re: No Invisible Character - NBSP at the start of a word"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Mark E. Shoulson wrote:

> Well, that's the difference under discussion. The "plain text" would
> seem to be either the qere or the ketiv (but not the combined "blended"
> form), since each of those is somewhat sensible.

Is there some place in the standard where it says text must be sensible?

-- 
Tiro Typeworks        www.tiro.com
Vancouver, BC        tiro@tiro.com
Currently reading:
The Peasant of the Garonne, by Jacques Maritain
Art and faith, by Jacques Maritain & Jean Cocteau
Difficulites, by Ronald Knox & Arnold Lunn

Next message: Addison Phillips [wM]: "RE: Ligatures"
Previous message: John Hudson: "Re: No Invisible Character - NBSP at the start of a word"
In reply to: Mark E. Shoulson: "Re: No Invisible Character - NBSP at the start of a word"
Next in thread: Asmus Freytag: "Re: No Invisible Character - NBSP at the start of a word"
Reply: Asmus Freytag: "Re: No Invisible Character - NBSP at the start of a word"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Nov 27 2004 - 18:59:23 CST