From: Doug Ewell (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Fri Dec 03 2004 - 10:28:58 CST
Peter Constable <petercon at microsoft dot com> quoted Peter R.
>> SIL-fonts and TITUS have been called legacy or not up to date in our
> What about the SIL and TITUS fonts is legacy?
There was a confused discussion last week over SIL Ezra and Ezra SIL,
and the fact that the older one used PUA code points (falsely rumored to
be "high ASCII") to support something that the newer one supported using
proper Unicode techniques. So the older one might be considered
"legacy" in a way.
Distribution of TITUS Cyberbit Basic was severely limited at one point,
and many users may still have versions that are only updated to Unicode
2.1. That would not count as "legacy," but it would certainly be "not
up to date."
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Dec 03 2004 - 10:34:38 CST