RE: OpenType vs TrueType (was current version of unicode-font)

• Previous message: Markus Scherer: "Re: Nicest UTF - string case mapping vs. UTF-8/32"
• In reply to: Peter Constable: "RE: OpenType vs TrueType (was current version of unicode-font)"
• Next in thread: Tom Gewecke: "RE: OpenType vs TrueType (was current version of unicode-font)"
• Reply: Tom Gewecke: "RE: OpenType vs TrueType (was current version of unicode-font)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On Fri, 3 Dec 2004 10:21:44 -0800, Peter Constable wrote:

> Indeed, the icon shows "O"; I have no idea where the reference to "OT"
> originated.

I for sure was confused some time ago, because the true .otf font files
have the same icon.

Cristi

• Next message: Cristian Secară: "RE: OpenType vs TrueType (was current version of unicode-font)"
• Previous message: Markus Scherer: "Re: Nicest UTF - string case mapping vs. UTF-8/32"
• In reply to: Peter Constable: "RE: OpenType vs TrueType (was current version of unicode-font)"
• Next in thread: Tom Gewecke: "RE: OpenType vs TrueType (was current version of unicode-font)"
• Reply: Tom Gewecke: "RE: OpenType vs TrueType (was current version of unicode-font)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Dec 03 2004 - 14:16:52 CST