RE: OpenType vs TrueType (was current version of unicode-font)

From: Peter Constable ([email protected])
Date: Fri Dec 03 2004 - 15:55:43 CST

Next message: Philippe Verdy: "Re: Nicest UTF"

Previous message: Philippe Verdy: "Re: Nicest UTF"
Maybe in reply to: Gary P. Grosso: "RE: OpenType vs TrueType (was current version of unicode-font)"
Next in thread: Peter Constable: "RE: OpenType vs TrueType (was current version of unicode-font)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf
> Of Tom Gewecke

> For example, the font Doulos SIL Regular.ttf has layout tables for
OpenType
> (Windows), AAT (Mac), and Graphite (for SIL WorldPad).

Which I think is a first: I'm not sure there are many fonts that have
tables to support even two of these technologies, let alone all three.

(BTW, I don't think it can any longer be said that Graphite is supported
only in SIL WorldPad.)

Peter Constable

Next message: Philippe Verdy: "Re: Nicest UTF"
Previous message: Philippe Verdy: "Re: Nicest UTF"
Maybe in reply to: Gary P. Grosso: "RE: OpenType vs TrueType (was current version of unicode-font)"
Next in thread: Peter Constable: "RE: OpenType vs TrueType (was current version of unicode-font)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Dec 03 2004 - 15:59:44 CST