RE: Arial Unicode MS

From: Peter Constable ([email protected])
Date: Mon Dec 06 2004 - 14:24:25 CST

Next message: Michael Everson: "Pour sauver la patrimoine de l'Imprimerie Nationale de France"

Previous message: Doug Ewell: "Invalid UTF-8 sequences (was: Re: Nicest UTF)"
Maybe in reply to: Johannes Bergerhausen: "Arial Unicode MS"
Next in thread: John H. Jenkins: "Re: Arial Unicode MS"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf
> Of Johannes Bergerhausen

> A Pan-Unicode-Font is a beautiful idea.
>
> Why Microsoft/Monotype stopped the developpement of further versions?

Well, I cannot say that there will be no further development of Arial
Unicode MS. However, both Microsoft and Monotype (last I spoke to them)
are not heavily pursuing the development of pan-unicode fonts because
there are several reasons why they are *not* a "beautiful idea". Some
reasons were mentioned in a post on this list just a few days ago (I
forget now from whom).

Peter Constable

Next message: Michael Everson: "Pour sauver la patrimoine de l'Imprimerie Nationale de France"
Previous message: Doug Ewell: "Invalid UTF-8 sequences (was: Re: Nicest UTF)"
Maybe in reply to: Johannes Bergerhausen: "Arial Unicode MS"
Next in thread: John H. Jenkins: "Re: Arial Unicode MS"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Dec 06 2004 - 14:25:12 CST