From: E. Keown (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Thu Jan 13 2005 - 12:20:46 CST
Thanks to all who took the trouble to write me back.
I gathered from what you wrote that there is more
conceptual 'distance' than I realized between Unicode
and ISO 10646.
It appeared to me that it's possible to be ISO
10646-compliant but, at the same time, to *not* be
Unicode-compliant, since apparently Unicode has
greater innate complexity.
So another question. Are the incorrect standard
combining classes for the Tiberian Hebrew diacritics
only part of Unicode, or are they also part of ISO
....thanks for all help--Elaine
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jan 13 2005 - 12:30:53 CST