RE: Hebrew combining classes (was ISO 10646 compliance and EU law)

From: Peter Constable (petercon@microsoft.com)
Date: Thu Jan 13 2005 - 14:50:16 CST

Next message: Rick McGowan: "Two new technical notes posted"

Previous message: Jony Rosenne: "RE: Hebrew combining classes (was ISO 10646 compliance and EU law)"
Maybe in reply to: Jony Rosenne: "RE: Hebrew combining classes (was ISO 10646 compliance and EU law)"
Next in thread: Mustafa Jabbar: "Unicode-Windows support in Mobile Phone"
Reply: Mustafa Jabbar: "Unicode-Windows support in Mobile Phone"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

> From: unicode-bounce@unicode.org [mailto:unicode-bounce@unicode.org]
On Behalf
> Of Jony Rosenne

> I object to the term "incorrect" relative to the "standard combining
classes
> for the Tiberian Hebrew diacritics"...

> Could we please be civil?

We all know that there are different opinions regarding the
appropriateness of "incorrect" or other such descriptions when applied
to this issue, but I don't think any incivility was at all implied or
intended by Elaine's choice of words.

Peter Constable

Next message: Rick McGowan: "Two new technical notes posted"
Previous message: Jony Rosenne: "RE: Hebrew combining classes (was ISO 10646 compliance and EU law)"
Maybe in reply to: Jony Rosenne: "RE: Hebrew combining classes (was ISO 10646 compliance and EU law)"
Next in thread: Mustafa Jabbar: "Unicode-Windows support in Mobile Phone"
Reply: Mustafa Jabbar: "Unicode-Windows support in Mobile Phone"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jan 13 2005 - 14:54:34 CST