From: Arcane Jill (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Wed Jan 19 2005 - 10:48:41 CST
As a programmer myself, I actually followed that explanation. But I wonder if
it's the right approach. Would it not be a more ... interesting ... approach,
to forget Flex, and instead write a brand new Unicode lexer generator which
generates a lexer that processes characters (not bytes)?
Just a thought
From: email@example.com [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]On
Behalf Of Hans Aberg
Sent: 19 January 2005 00:10
To: Jon Hanna; email@example.com
Subject: Re: 32'nd bit & UTF-8
A lexer generator like Flex does not process Unicode directly, it generates a
lexer that processes bytes.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jan 19 2005 - 10:50:14 CST