Re: Subject: Re: 32'nd bit & UTF-8

From: Rick McGowan (
Date: Thu Jan 20 2005 - 12:30:28 CST

  • Next message: Andrew C. West: "Re: UTF-8 'BOM'"

    > So, in short, you say that nobody has the need for BOM's.
    > But still Unicode does require them.

    You have still not pointed to any text in the standard that requires the
    use of BOM. Please either point to the text in the standard, or refrain
    from saying that the standard requires them.


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jan 20 2005 - 12:31:14 CST