From: Hans Aberg (email@example.com)
Date: Thu Jan 20 2005 - 18:52:35 CST
On 2005/01/20 19:30, Rick McGowan at firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
>> So, in short, you say that nobody has the need for BOM's.
>> But still Unicode does require them.
> You have still not pointed to any text in the standard that requires the
> use of BOM. Please either point to the text in the standard, or refrain
> from saying that the standard requires them.
I have given a reference to posts here where people make that claim. If you
work with them, you might determine if there really is a UTF-8 process
requirement of BOM's.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jan 20 2005 - 18:54:34 CST