RE: Conformance (was UTF, BOM, etc)

• Previous message: Rick McGowan: "Unicode.org is back on-line"
• Maybe in reply to: Arcane Jill: "Conformance (was UTF, BOM, etc)"
• Next in thread: Michael \(michka\) Kaplan: "Re: Conformance (was UTF, BOM, etc)"
• Reply: Michael \(michka\) Kaplan: "Re: Conformance (was UTF, BOM, etc)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

> From: unicode-bounce@unicode.org [mailto:unicode-bounce@unicode.org]
On
> Behalf Of Peter Kirk

> Microsoft is not interested in console applications.

I don't think I would make that claim.

Peter Constable

• Next message: Lars Kristan: "RE: I Heart Huckabees"
• Previous message: Rick McGowan: "Unicode.org is back on-line"
• Maybe in reply to: Arcane Jill: "Conformance (was UTF, BOM, etc)"
• Next in thread: Michael \(michka\) Kaplan: "Re: Conformance (was UTF, BOM, etc)"
• Reply: Michael \(michka\) Kaplan: "Re: Conformance (was UTF, BOM, etc)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Jan 24 2005 - 11:33:30 CST