RE: Open Issue #61: Proposed Update UAX #15 Unicode Normalization Forms

From: Jony Rosenne (rosennej@qsm.co.il)
Date: Thu Jan 27 2005 - 03:09:41 CST

  • Next message: Simon Josefsson: "Re: Open Issue #61: Proposed Update UAX #15 Unicode Normalization Forms"

    I think it should have been clear by now that the Hebrew combining classes
    do not need to be corrected, are not wrong, are not incorrect, are not
    mis-assigned etc. and do not cause any known problems.

    Jony

    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: unicode-bounce@unicode.org
    > [mailto:unicode-bounce@unicode.org] On Behalf Of Christopher Fynn
    > Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2005 9:57 AM
    > Cc: unicode@unicode.org
    > Subject: Re: Open Issue #61: Proposed Update UAX #15 Unicode
    > Normalization Forms
    >
    >
    > Peter Kirk wrote:
    >
    > > But I agree with you that there is something very odd about
    > a situation
    > > in which Unicode refuses point blank to consider correcting certain
    > > errors e.g. (arguably) mis-assigned combining classes, on
    > the basis that
    > > in theoretical cases they break normalisation stability,
    > but yet allowed
    > > this correction.
    >
    > If the change in UAX #15 is made perhaps it would be
    > opportune to fix any
    > "mis-assigned" combining classes which are known to cause
    > problems at the
    > same time.
    >
    > - chris
    >
    >
    >
    >



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jan 27 2005 - 03:10:57 CST