RE: Surrogate points

From: Jon Hanna (
Date: Fri Jan 28 2005 - 12:24:33 CST

  • Next message: Magda Danish \(Unicode\): "FW: Subj: Scotland"

    > You have a point in that these slots should be currently be treated as
    > though not belonging to the Unicode domain. So the suggestion
    > is then to
    > (sematically) move them into the valid Unicode range, though
    > promised to
    > remain empty until it is pragmatic to fill them.

    Hey, how about suggesting that Unicode become stateful? That'd give us even
    more codepoints we don't have any need for and cause even more havoc to
    running code.

    Jon Hanna
    Work: <>
    Play: <>
    Chat: <irc://>

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Jan 28 2005 - 12:25:43 CST