Re: Codepoint Differentiation - Serbian t: Totally New Solution

From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk (qrczak@knm.org.pl)
Date: Sun Feb 27 2005 - 14:59:28 CST

  • Next message: Asmus Freytag: "Re: E0000 Language Tags for Some Obscure Languages"

    The unicode.org server doesn't like me and even doesn't say why.
    I'm resending the message from a different address, the content is below.
    Meanwhile it would be great if somebody fixed the configuration so that
    it doesn't treat me as a spammer... 

    ----
A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:
  unicode@unicode.org
    SMTP error from remote mailer after MAIL FROM:<qrczak@knm.org.pl>:
    host unicode.org [69.13.187.164]: 550 5.0.0 Spam access denied.
------ This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. ------
Return-path: <qrczak@knm.org.pl>
Received: from qrczak by qrnik.knm.org.pl with local (Exim 3.36 #1)
	id 1D5Tis-0002be-00
	for unicode@unicode.org; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 20:04:58 +0100
To: unicode@unicode.org
Subject: Re: Codepoint Differentiation - Serbian t: Totally New Solution
X-Face: OW>RV&gN+&b-aiNY|U)f=S%w+/rK!);f>/W9IXg})]&F>ht.1Up8@04+_!gOp(_/l_-+E^.
 2\vI)1=D,%HWiq)r(M/V~dr^5T^KF/[w5YZ4<0Sus3+O>l3uA/&W_21m?.s,Po8{pb0@
References: <F8ACB1B494D9734783AAB114D0CE68FE052ED0DC@RED-MSG-52.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
	<42210069.618959A0@dfa-mail.com> <4221301A.80207@earthlink.net>
	<4221F1CB.C6A8DD0E@dfa-mail.com>
From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk <qrczak@knm.org.pl>
Mail-Followup-To: unicode@unicode.org
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 20:04:58 +0100
In-Reply-To: <4221F1CB.C6A8DD0E@dfa-mail.com> (UList@dfa-mail.com's message
 of "Sun, 27 Feb 2005 08:14:09 -0800")
Message-ID: <87y8d93jtx.fsf@qrnik.zagroda>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk <qrczak@knm.org.pl>
UList@dfa-mail.com writes:
> I think a really excellent thing for Serbs to "tag" in their data -- with
> these disrecommended but entirely user-discretionary tags -- is a particular
> letter of the Cyrillic alphabet. In fact I would put a TAG "S" next to every
> occurence of a particular Cyrillic letter.
AFAIK French people tend to write "r" and "z" thus:
    ()_          _
    /  |        / \_/
   /   |       /   /
       |          /
       |   /     /   /
        \_/     /___/
                   /\
                  /  \
                 /   /
                 \__/
while in Polish they are almost always written thus:
    _           _
   / | /\      / \_/
     |/  \_   /   /
     |           /
     |          /   /
     |         / \_/
Somehow the idea of tagging each "r" and "z" in texts in one of these
languages sounds a bad idea...
-- 
   __("<         Marcin Kowalczyk
   \__/       qrczak@knm.org.pl
    ^^     http://qrnik.knm.org.pl/~qrczak/

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Feb 27 2005 - 15:00:14 CST