From: Chris Jacobs (chris.jacobs@freeler.nl)
Date: Sun Mar 06 2005 - 19:38:33 CST
I think this would indeed work, but it would be an unacceptable hack.
This kind of hack is good enough for Baltic ( see version 4.0, section 7.1,
page 169) where without the combining dot above the resulting i without dot
is just an ugly glyph, but not for Turkish, where dotless i is a different
char.
----- Original Message -----
From: "vlad" <emperor.vlad@gmail.com>
To: <unicode@unicode.org>
Sent: Monday, March 07, 2005 1:41 AM
Subject: Re: CGJ for Two Greek Ligatures?
> Couldn't the automatic ligation of fi be prevented in Turkish/Azeri by
> encoding their dotted i as i + COMBINING DOT ABOVE, rather than i
> alone?
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Mar 06 2005 - 19:43:56 CST