Re: CGJ for Two Greek Ligatures?

From: Chris Jacobs (
Date: Sun Mar 06 2005 - 19:38:33 CST

  • Next message: Patrick Andries: "Re: Egyptian Transliteration Characters?"

    I think this would indeed work, but it would be an unacceptable hack.

    This kind of hack is good enough for Baltic ( see version 4.0, section 7.1,
    page 169) where without the combining dot above the resulting i without dot
    is just an ugly glyph, but not for Turkish, where dotless i is a different

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "vlad" <>
    To: <>
    Sent: Monday, March 07, 2005 1:41 AM
    Subject: Re: CGJ for Two Greek Ligatures?

    > Couldn't the automatic ligation of fi be prevented in Turkish/Azeri by
    > encoding their dotted i as i + COMBINING DOT ABOVE, rather than i
    > alone?

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Mar 06 2005 - 19:43:56 CST