Re: Unicode Stability

From: Patrick Andries (
Date: Mon Mar 07 2005 - 02:58:30 CST

  • Next message: Erik van der Poel: "Re: Unicode abuse"
    Jon Hanna a écrit :
    Jon Hanna a écrit : 
    		How about the impact of XML's choice of 
    converting line-end 
    		(even U+2028)  to U+000A ?
    	Nil. It provides different mechanisms for indicating 
    the same semantic distinctions.
    Well, surely it does not promote the use of U+2028...
    It's not it's job to promote it's use. 
    Its ?

    We were simply speaking of impact, go back to Doug Ewell message please :

    « Tragically, U+2028 and U+2029 are almost completely unused today, while
    the CR/LF silliness continues.  Ironically, it was probably the success
    of UTF-8, with its promise of ASCII compatibility, that spelled the end
    for U+2028.


    P. A.

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Mar 06 2005 - 23:59:31 CST