Re: Encoded rendering instructions (was Unicode's Mandate)

From: Arcane Jill (arcanejill@ramonsky.com)
Date: Fri Mar 11 2005 - 03:10:28 CST

  • Next message: Andrew C. West: "Re: UCD stability"

    511, surely? Otherwise we'd have to notate every single character as "not
    damaged".

    Anyway - this sounds like an ideal job for the PUA to me.

    Jill

    -----Original Message-----
    From: unicode-bounce@unicode.org [mailto:unicode-bounce@unicode.org]On
    Behalf Of Dean Snyder
    Sent: 10 March 2005 16:36
    To: Unicode List
    Subject: Re: Encoded rendering instructions (was Unicode's Mandate)

    2) encode 512 damage characters, one for each possible combination of
    damaged areas

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Mar 11 2005 - 03:12:36 CST