Re: Serbian-Latin "sh" alias and ISO-639-1 within CLDR

From: Philippe Verdy (verdy_p@wanadoo.fr)
Date: Mon Mar 14 2005 - 13:27:49 CST

  • Next message: Philippe Verdy: "Re: Serbian-Latin "sh" alias and ISO-639-1 within CLDR"

    From: "Mark Davis" <mark.davis@jtcsv.com>
    To: "Philippe Verdy" <verdy_p@wanadoo.fr>; <unicode@unicode.org>
    Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 6:19 PM
    Subject: Re: Serbian-Latin "sh" alias and ISO-639-1 within CLDR

    > If you look at the content, you'll see that "sh" is just an alias for
    > sr_Latn.

    Yes I know that (and I did day it in my message), but that's not my
    question...
    I was wondering whever "sh" has an assignment in ISO 639-1, and if so, if
    that does not conflict with the defined alias.
    Or if "sh" is projected as a future ISO 639-1 assignment for Serbian Latin,
    distinct from "sr" which would default to Cyrillic.
    It may be helpful when handling localization (notably in Java), where the
    selection of script is not easy...



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Mar 14 2005 - 13:28:57 CST