RE: Serbian-Latin "sh" alias and ISO-639-1 within CLDR

From: Peter Constable (
Date: Mon Mar 14 2005 - 18:49:47 CST

  • Next message: Mark Davis: "Re: Serbian-Latin "sh" alias and ISO-639-1 within CLDR"

    > From: []
    On Behalf
    > Of Philippe Verdy

    > I was wondering whever "sh" has an assignment in ISO 639-1, and if so,
    > that does not conflict with the defined alias.
    > Or if "sh" is projected as a future ISO 639-1 assignment for Serbian
    > distinct from "sr" which would default to Cyrillic.

    No, "sh" will not be assigned in the future in ISO 639-1 to mean
    "Serbian written in Latin script". ISO 639-1 does not encode
    distinctions for script, and "sh" has already been given the meaning

    Peter Constable

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Mar 14 2005 - 18:50:59 CST