From: Peter Constable (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Mon Mar 14 2005 - 18:49:47 CST
> From: email@example.com [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
> Of Philippe Verdy
> I was wondering whever "sh" has an assignment in ISO 639-1, and if so,
> that does not conflict with the defined alias.
> Or if "sh" is projected as a future ISO 639-1 assignment for Serbian
> distinct from "sr" which would default to Cyrillic.
No, "sh" will not be assigned in the future in ISO 639-1 to mean
"Serbian written in Latin script". ISO 639-1 does not encode
distinctions for script, and "sh" has already been given the meaning
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Mar 14 2005 - 18:50:59 CST