RE: Decomposition vs Full decomposition?

From: Michael Everson (everson@evertype.com)
Date: Tue Mar 15 2005 - 15:28:40 CST

Next message: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk: "Re: Decomposition vs Full decomposition?"

Previous message: Peter Constable: "RE: Decomposition vs Full decomposition?"
Maybe in reply to: Theodore H. Smith: "Decomposition vs Full decomposition?"
Next in thread: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk: "Re: Decomposition vs Full decomposition?"
Reply: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk: "Re: Decomposition vs Full decomposition?"
Reply: Peter Kirk: "Re: Decomposition vs Full decomposition?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

At 13:16 -0800 2005-03-15, Peter Constable wrote:

>U+048A CYRILLIC CAPITAL LETTER SHORT I WITH TAIL

The Cyrillic short thingy isn't a combining character. And it's not a
breve. (You knew this, but others mightn't.)

-- 
Michael Everson * * Everson Typography *  * http://www.evertype.com

Next message: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk: "Re: Decomposition vs Full decomposition?"
Previous message: Peter Constable: "RE: Decomposition vs Full decomposition?"
Maybe in reply to: Theodore H. Smith: "Decomposition vs Full decomposition?"
Next in thread: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk: "Re: Decomposition vs Full decomposition?"
Reply: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk: "Re: Decomposition vs Full decomposition?"
Reply: Peter Kirk: "Re: Decomposition vs Full decomposition?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Mar 15 2005 - 15:29:38 CST