Re: Decomposition vs Full decomposition?

From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk (qrczak@knm.org.pl)
Date: Tue Mar 15 2005 - 16:07:17 CST

Next message: Michael Everson: "Re: Decomposition vs Full decomposition?"

Previous message: Michael Everson: "RE: Decomposition vs Full decomposition?"
In reply to: Michael Everson: "RE: Decomposition vs Full decomposition?"
Next in thread: Michael Everson: "Re: Decomposition vs Full decomposition?"
Reply: Michael Everson: "Re: Decomposition vs Full decomposition?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Michael Everson <everson@evertype.com> writes:

>>U+048A CYRILLIC CAPITAL LETTER SHORT I WITH TAIL
>
> The Cyrillic short thingy isn't a combining character.

Why was it decided so? Just curious.

-- 
   __("<         Marcin Kowalczyk
   \__/       qrczak@knm.org.pl
    ^^     http://qrnik.knm.org.pl/~qrczak/

Next message: Michael Everson: "Re: Decomposition vs Full decomposition?"
Previous message: Michael Everson: "RE: Decomposition vs Full decomposition?"
In reply to: Michael Everson: "RE: Decomposition vs Full decomposition?"
Next in thread: Michael Everson: "Re: Decomposition vs Full decomposition?"
Reply: Michael Everson: "Re: Decomposition vs Full decomposition?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Mar 15 2005 - 16:08:12 CST