From: Patrick Andries (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Tue Mar 15 2005 - 17:42:34 CST
Michael Everson a écrit :
> At 23:07 +0100 2005-03-15, Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk wrote:
>> > The Cyrillic short thingy isn't a combining character.
True for U+048A, but how about in U+0439 ? I believe U+0439 CYRILLIC
SMALL LETTER SHORT I is canonically equivalent to 0438 0306 ? See also
U+040E, U+04C1, U+04D0, U+04D6.
(However, if I believe Yannis Haralambous typographically the 0306
used above Cyrillic letters has a slightly different glyph from the
breve used let's say in API -- the breve being thicker in the center)
>> Why was it decided so? Just curious.
> Because they aren't productive.
What is « they » here ? We were speaking the Cyrillic short thingy, I
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Mar 15 2005 - 17:43:37 CST