From: Mark Davis (email@example.com)
Date: Wed Mar 23 2005 - 16:58:35 CST
"suspicious" is really the wrong word. There are many (perhaps most) uncased
characters (in bicameral scripts) that are archaic or special purpose (eg
IPA). So we want to separate those out.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Patrick Andries" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
To: "Mark Davis" <email@example.com>
Cc: "Unicode Mailing List" <firstname.lastname@example.org>; "UnicoRe Mailing List"
Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2005 11:19
Subject: Re: Security Issues
> Mark Davis a écrit :
> >C. Characters with no uppercase in bicameral scripts may be suspect, and
> >disallowed or flagged. Which of these really need to be allowed?
> >U+04C0 ( Ӏ ) PALOCHKA?)
> Why is this suspicious ? Why is this more suscpicious that using
> apostrophe in French or English which has no camerality ?
> P. A.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Mar 23 2005 - 17:05:12 CST