Re: Security Issues

• Previous message: Mark Davis: "Re: Security Issues"
• In reply to: Patrick Andries: "Re: Security Issues"
• Next in thread: Peter Kirk: "Re: Security Issues"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

"suspicious" is really the wrong word. There are many (perhaps most) uncased
characters (in bicameral scripts) that are archaic or special purpose (eg
IPA). So we want to separate those out.

‎Mark

----- Original Message -----
From: "Patrick Andries" <[email protected]>
To: "Mark Davis" <[email protected]>
Cc: "Unicode Mailing List" <[email protected]>; "UnicoRe Mailing List"
<[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2005 11:19
Subject: Re: Security Issues

> Mark Davis a écrit :
>
> >C. Characters with no uppercase in bicameral scripts may be suspect, and
> >disallowed or flagged. Which of these really need to be allowed?
(Example:
> >U+04C0 ( Ӏ ) PALOCHKA?)
> >
> >
> >
> Why is this suspicious ? Why is this more suscpicious that using
> apostrophe in French or English which has no camerality ?
>
> P. A.
>
>
>

• Next message: Erik van der Poel: "Re: Security Issues"
• Previous message: Mark Davis: "Re: Security Issues"
• In reply to: Patrick Andries: "Re: Security Issues"
• Next in thread: Peter Kirk: "Re: Security Issues"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Mar 23 2005 - 17:05:12 CST